“Binocular Vision” is written from
the point of view of a child living next door to the object of his scrutiny. We
do not get to see everything that is going on in the house next door, just what
the child sees looking into various windows. We do not get to know more about
the residents than what the child observes and assumes. We find out at the end
that looks can be deceiving and that the child’s assumptions were incorrect. He
assumed that the couple was contentedly married and the man went to work every day
while the woman took care of the house. But, he was wrong. They were not a
couple but mother and son and they were not both content. The man was depressed
enough to commit suicide in the garage. There is very little dialogue in the
story.
“Mud” is written from the point of
view of a widower. He sees the ghosts or bodies or spirits of those he has
lost. We, the readers, do not get a clear understanding of why he is seeing
them now. He just sees his father and grandmother doing what they did all the
time when they were alive. She was in the kitchen and he was in the living room
watching television. He wants to talk to them and to hug them, but he has an
important meeting to go to. He has the most difficulty not going to see his
wife when he hears her voice. This story unlike the previous one is moved by
the dialogue. We don’t get a complete sense of what the people were like before
death, we only see his interpretation of them after death. Which is similar to “Binocular
Vision” because we are only seeing what the main character saw in his family
members.
No comments:
Post a Comment